How can the #Feesmustfall Campaign be Justified Unemployment remains one of the most persistent and pervasive challenges faced by societies worldwide. Its impacts ripple through economies, affecting individuals, families, and communities in profound ways. While economists and policymakers offer various theories and analyses, understanding unemployment requires delving deeper into its root causes.
The #FeesMustFall campaign began in South Africa in 2015, sparked by proposed university fee increases that sparked widespread protests among students. Many who support the movement argue that it represents an essential fight against systemic inequality in the education system, a carry-over from apartheid’s damaging legacy. On the other hand, critics question the feasibility of free higher education and the disruptive methods used during the campaign. This article aims to explore the reasons that justify the #FeesMustFall campaign.
How can the #Feesmustfall Campaign be Justified
Education as a Right, Not a Privilege
The central premise of the #FeesMustFall movement is that higher education should be accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status. This idea aligns with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states, “Everyone has the right to education.” The campaign argues that the prohibitive cost of university fees directly violates this right, making education a privilege of the wealthy rather than a fundamental human right.
A Response to Socioeconomic Disparity
South Africa has one of the highest rates of income inequality globally, and the cost of higher education tends to exacerbate this divide. High university fees disproportionately affect disadvantaged students, creating an unbalanced system where only those who can afford tuition have access to higher education. By campaigning for the abolition of university fees, the #FeesMustFall movement seeks to rectify this socioeconomic disparity, promoting equal opportunities for all students.
Breaking the Cycle of Debt
For many students, accessing higher education means taking on significant debt, which can take years, if not decades, to repay. This reality creates a cycle of debt that can be challenging to break free from and can limit opportunities later in life. The #FeesMustFall campaign argues that education should not burden students with such financial strain.
Investment in the Future
The #FeesMustFall movement suggests that free higher education should be seen as an investment in the future of the country. By educating its citizens, a country is investing in its own socio-economic development. A well-educated population is generally more equipped to create innovative solutions, start businesses, and contribute meaningfully to society.
International Precedent
Several countries, notably in Europe, offer free or highly subsidized higher education. These countries recognize the social and economic benefits of an educated populace and work to minimize financial barriers to higher education. The existence of such systems globally lends credibility to the demands of the #FeesMustFall campaign.
Disadvantages: Critiques and Counter-Arguments
Despite the justifications mentioned above, the #FeesMustFall campaign has faced criticism. Some argue that a fully subsidized education is financially unsustainable for the government and that resources could be better spent elsewhere. Others suggest that instead of making all education free, there should be a greater focus on scholarships and grants for those who need it most.
Critics also question the disruptive tactics employed during the campaign, such as protests and strikes, which can impact learning. They argue that such methods might detract from the broader aim of improving education access.